Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737896›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026

Noninvasive Assessment of the Ulnar Nerve in the Upper Extremity Using Machine Learning.

Akhil Dondapati, Andrew Rodenhouse, Thomas J Carroll, Jeffrey Lillie, Ajay Anand, Lisa Pink, David Mitten, Constantinos Ketonis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akhil DondapatiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Andrew RodenhouseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Thomas J CarrollDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Jeffrey LillieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Ajay AnandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Lisa PinkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
David MittenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Constantinos KetonisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning algorithm trained on ultrasound images of the cubital tunnel that can be used to automatically identify, segment, and measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve. Methods: Control subjects and patients were scanned using a Fujifilm-SonoSite ultrasound system, equipped with a high-frequency linear array probe by a trained technician or physician. The ulnar nerve was identified and segmented in individual frames using a custom graphical user interface application. A convolutional neural network (YOLOv8) was then trained on these images to automatically detect the ulnar nerve, resulting in a binary map. The CSA and Dice score were then computed using the binary map of the nerve outline from the prediction and ground truth to assess the prediction accuracy. Results: In total, 34 subjects (11 patients and 23 controls) were imaged with ultrasound. A total of 2,011 ultrasound grayscale images were extracted, and the ulnar nerve was segmented from these scans. In total, 1,286 images from 23 subjects (seven patients and 16 controls) were used to train the model, 425 images from five subjects (two patients and three controls) were used for validation, and 300 images from six subjects (two patients and four controls) for testing. The machine learning model (YOLOv8) resulted in an average Dice score of 0.90 with 296 images (99%) achieving a Dice score above 0.75. When comparing the CSA predictions from the machine learning model to the area derived from the ground truth, the mean difference and mean absolute difference were 1.78 (13.80%) mm Conclusions: Ultrasound is an emerging noninvasive modality for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome. However, its implementation remains challenging because of operator dependence and technical variability. This work establishes a foundational step toward fully automated, operator-independent ultrasound assessment of the ulnar nerve. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCubital tunnelMachine learningUlnar nerveUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41737896
PMCPMC12927053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.