ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026
Universal Fiducial Markers for Multi-Modal Radiotherapy.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Integrating multiple radiotherapy modalities, including photon and proton therapy, within a single clinical facility requires universal fiducial markers that perform reliably across all imaging and treatment systems. For computed tomography (CT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), fiducials should be large enough to ensure visibility without introducing significant image artifacts. In CyberKnife treatments, a fiducial diameter of at least 0.75 mm is necessary to maintain accurate tracking, particularly in the abdominal and pelvic regions. However, fiducials of this size are unsuitable for proton therapy due to the considerable beam perturbation they cause. This study investigates the design and implementation of customized fiducials that balance imaging visibility, tracking reliability, and proton beam perturbation, enabling their use across multiple radiotherapy modalities. Materials/Methods: Customized coil-shaped platinum fiducials with a 0.75 mm diameter and variable coil gaps were developed to reduce the amount of metal in the proton beam path. For image visibility and trackability assessments, both standard fiducials (0.5 and 0.75 mm diameters with nominally zero coil gaps) and customized versions were inserted in an anthropomorphic phantom. Visibility was evaluated using cone-beam CT (CBCT) and kilovoltage (kV) imaging on both photon and proton treatment systems. Trackability was assessed in the CyberKnife system using an anthropomorphic phantom and a respiratory motion platform. Proton beam perturbation was measured using radiochromic films that were placed downstream of the fiducials and irradiated with a broad spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. A triple-channel film dosimetry method was employed for analysis. Results: Customized fiducials with increased coil gaps demonstrated visibility comparable to standard fiducials in IGRT for both photon and proton systems. In the CyberKnife system, these customized fiducials also provided reliable tracking performance under both static conditions and simulated respiratory motion. The film measurements revealed that the customized fiducials with coil gaps larger than 0.5 mm/coil could significantly reduce proton beam perturbation compared to both the standard 0.75 and 0.5 mm diameter fiducials. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of redesigning fiducial markers to maintain a large diameter for reliable imaging visibility and trackability while minimizing proton beam perturbation by increasing the coil gap. Adopting a universal fiducial marker design has the potential to streamline clinical workflows and support seamless integration across various radiotherapy modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.