Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026

Serum biomarker screening and metabolic profiling analysis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients using untargeted metabolomics and machine learning techniques.

Lijuan Dan, Huan Shi, Lina Cao, Xiuyan Li, Lirui Kong, Xiaojie You, Wenping Liu, Yanwei Hao, Dong Wang, Hongfei Song and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lijuan Dan *Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Huan Shi *Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Lina CaoSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Xiuyan LiChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Lirui KongClinical Laboratory, West Area of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xiaojie YouChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Wenping LiuChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yanwei HaoChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Dong WangChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hongfei SongChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jie MuChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Qiao LiClinical Laboratory, West Area of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents the most prevalent chronic hepatic metabolic disorder globally. Without timely intervention, it can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), liver fibrosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Early detection and diagnosis are critical for disease management. metabolomics, a powerful tool for identifying diagnostic metabolic biomarkers of diseases, is frequently integrated with machine learning (ML) algorithms to improve analytical efficiency. This study aims to compare serum metabolomic profiles between NAFLD patients and healthy controls, identify differential metabolites, and employ machine learning algorithms to discover biomarkers with diagnostic value. Methods: This study enrolled 26 healthy controls and 165 patients diagnosed with NAFLD via ultrasound, and performed serum untargeted metabolomics analysis. Specifically, metabolomics techniques were used to detect serum metabolites, while orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was applied to screen for significantly differential metabolites between groups and conduct pathway enrichment analysis. In the ML phase, the dataset was split at an 8:2 ratio: 80% of the data (131 NAFLD cases and 21 healthy controls) was used for model training, and 20% (34 NAFLD cases and five healthy controls) served as an independent test set to validate model performance. Results: Metabolomic differential analysis identified 942 significantly differential metabolites (656 upregulated and 286 downregulated) between the NAFLD and healthy control groups, which were primarily enriched in caffeine metabolism, cholesterol metabolism, and the FoxO and AMPK signaling pathways. After training and validating machine learning models, serum metabolites maresin 1, canavaninosuccinate, paraxanthine, and 1-methyluric acid demonstrated robust diagnostic performance for NAFLD and can serve as independent predictive biomarkers, with 1-methyluric acid exhibiting the highest diagnostic contribution. Conclusion: Integration of untargeted metabolomics and machine learning effectively distinguishes NAFLD patients from healthy controls. cholesterol metabolism, caffeine metabolism, and the FoxO and AMPK signaling pathways may participate in NAFLD pathogenesis. ML-validated metabolites 1-methyluric acid, paraxanthine, canavaninosuccinate, and maresin one hold potential as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for NAFLD, with 1-methyluric acid exhibiting the highest diagnostic relevance. In summary, serum metabolomics provides stable, accurate biomarkers for NAFLD early warning and diagnosis, and this study offers data and resource support for optimizing its clinical.

Indexed as

AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase)differentially expressed metabolitesmachine learningmetabolomicsnon-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Identifiers

PMID41737828
PMCPMC12926098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.