Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737821›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2026

Improving Skin Lesion Diagnosis: A Hybrid Approach Using Orthogonal Combination of Local Binary Pattern Features and Ensemble Learning for Diagnostic Accuracy.

Nasrin Rahmani, Hossein Ebrahimnezhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nasrin RahmaniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.
Hossein EbrahimnezhadDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the world becomes wealthier and people expect higher standards of care, the demand for healthcare services is growing rapidly. This puts significant pressure on existing medical resources and systems, making it harder to meet everyone's needs. In dermatology, for instance, the rising demand calls for creative and efficient solutions, especially in diagnosing conditions like skin cancer. Early diagnosis of skin lesions is necessary not only for effective treatment but also for providing the best possible outcomes for patients. Methods: In this paper, we present a solution using machine learning (ML) to assist in automated skin diagnosis, with a particular focus on the early detection of skin lesions, which is a key factor for effective treatment and better patient outcomes. Our method utilizes a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) with geometric features to enhance image quality by removing artifacts. We then use a color descriptor based on hybrid orthogonal combination of local binary patterns to capture the unique characteristics of the lesions. To identify the most important features for accurate classification, we apply ReliefF feature selection, prioritizing those that contribute most significantly to the results. Finally, we used several ML models such as decision tree, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, multilayer perceptron, and ensemble extra tree (ET) to classify eight different types of skin lesions effectively. Results: Remarkably, ensemble ET achieves superior performance with an accuracy of 97.31%. Conclusions: This research advances early skin lesion diagnosis, enhancing patient care in dermatology.

Indexed as

ClassificationdermatologyGaussian mixture modelhealth carehybrid orthogonal combination of local binary patternsskin lesion

Identifiers

PMID41737821
PMCPMC12928557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.