ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic myomectomy: surgical outcomes from a tertiary center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively analyze myomectomy cases performed in our clinic using laparotomic and laparoscopic techniques, and to compare the effects of both surgical approaches on various clinical and surgical outcomes. Materials and methods: Patient records of myomectomy operations performed between 2015 and 2025 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine, were reviewed. A total of 213 patients were included, comprising 140 laparoscopic and 73 laparotomic cases. The data such as patient age, number and size of removed myomas, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, postoperative additional analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay and complication rates will be analyzed to evaluate the advantages of each method in terms of patient comfort and surgical efficacy. Results: The mean age of patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy was significantly higher than those in the laparotomic group ( Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy provides considerable advantages over laparotomic myomectomy, including reduced hospital stay and lower postoperative analgesic requirements. While laparotomy remains preferable for larger myomas, laparoscopic approaches yield comparable outcomes in terms of hemoglobin levels and complication rates. With appropriate patient selection, laparoscopic myomectomy is a preferred surgical method due to its positive impact on patient recovery, comfort and overall surgical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.