Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737732›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Deep learning analysis of MRI to assess rectal cancer treatment.

Heather M Selby, Ashley Y Son, Vipul R Sheth, Todd H Wagner, Erqi L Pollom, Arden M Morris

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04380337 (Phase II Trial of Organ Preservation Program Using Short-Course Radiation and FOLFOXIRI for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04380337 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Trial of Organ Preservation Program Using Short-Course Radiation and FOLFOXIRI for Rectal Cancer (SHORT-FOX)

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled38ConditionsRectal CancerArmsFOLFOXIRI, FOLFOX regimen, XELOX, IMRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather M SelbyStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center (S-SPIRE Center), Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Ashley Y SonStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center (S-SPIRE Center), Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Vipul R ShethDepartment of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Todd H WagnerStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center (S-SPIRE Center), Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Erqi L PollomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Arden M MorrisStanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center (S-SPIRE Center), Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) results in pathologic complete response (pCR) in approximately 15% of patients, supporting non-operative strategies for those with clinical complete response (cCR). The subjectivity and variability in MRI-based cCR assessments highlight the need for objective, quantitative tools. Objective: To develop deep learning models for automated rectal tumor segmentation on pre- and post-treatment MRIs, and to identify radiomic features differentiating cCR from non-cCR patients. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-treatment MRIs from 37 LARC patients enrolled in a Phase 2 TNT trial (NCT04380337). Rectal tumors were segmented on T2-weighted images by two data scientists, refined by a radiologist (reference standard), and independently segmented by a fellow. For pre-treatment segmentation, Model 1 (baseline; Results: For pre-treatment segmentation, radiologist-fellow inter-rater agreement was DSC Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of deep learning-based automated segmentation and radiomic profiling for differentiating treatment response in rectal cancer. Semi-supervised learning with pseudo-labeled data significantly improved segmentation performance, offering a practical approach to overcome limited annotations. Radiomic features warrant validation in larger multi-center studies for clinical translation.

Indexed as

clinical complete responsedeep learningMRInnU-Netrectal cancersegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41737732
PMCPMC12927481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.