Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737687›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Establishment of a droplet digital PCR detection method for Vp4 gene of PoRV.

Xinwei Tan, Xiaoyu Zheng, Guangyuan Zou, Manxin Ma, Ze Yuan, Gong Lang, Guihong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinwei Tan *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyu Zheng *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangyuan ZouGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Manxin MaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Ze YuanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Gong LangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Guihong ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhea outbreaks in pigs occur most frequently during winter, porcine rotavirus (PoRV) is one of the important diarrheal diseases. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (DDPCR), a detection method that can perform absolute quantification of genes. The study aimed to diagnose PoRV infection using a probe-based DDPCR. 10 2-day-old piglets with mild diarrhea were obtained from a commercial pig farm. No PoRV was detected in the anal swab using colloidal gold test strips. To verify the results of the colloidal gold test strips, RT-qPCR was performed, which identified PoRV in six piglets. Given the limited sensitivity of colloidal gold test strips and RT-qPCR, we developed a DDPCR assay targeting the PoRV Vp4 gene for enhanced detection. The DDPCR assay demonstrated optimal performance at a primer:probe concentration of 400:400 nM and an annealing temperature of 57 °C. It achieved a minimum detection limit of 0.21 copies/μL, the detection sensitivity has been enhanced by 100 times compared to RT-qPCR. Using the established DDPCR detection method, the four samples that tested negative by RT-qPCR were re-tested, and all were found to be PoRV-positive, indicating that the sensitivity of DDPCR was higher than that of RT-qPCR. This study highlights its potential as a valuable tool for early clinical diagnosis and disease control in piglets.

Indexed as

clinical diagnosisDDPCRdetection methodPoRVVP4

Identifiers

PMID41737687
PMCPMC12926159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.