Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737630›Full record

ArticleInformation sciences2026

Machine Learning on Dynamic Functional Connectivity: Promise, Pitfalls, and Interpretations.

Jiaqi Ding, Tingting Dan, Ziquan Wei, Paul J Laurienti, Guorong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Information sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaqi DingDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.
Tingting DanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.
Ziquan WeiDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.
Paul J LaurientiSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, 27157, North Carolina, USA.
Guorong WuDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Understanding Selectivity Mechanisms of Network Vulnerability and Resilience in Alzheimer's Disease by Establishing a Neurobiological Basis through Network NeuroscienceRF1AG068399 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WU, GUORONG · 2020 to 2020
$1.9M
Summer Research Education Program for Promoting Computational Neuroimaging Technology in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and AD-Related Dementias (ADRD)R25AG086105 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jasleen Kaur, Minjeong Kim · 2024 to 2026
$604k
Understanding Selectivity Mechanisms of Network Vulnerability and Resilience in Alzheimer's Disease by Establishing a Neurobiological Basis through Network NeuroscienceR01AG068399 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WU, GUORONG · 2024 to 2024
$481k
Promoting Collaborative Research on Human Connectome Analysis for Substance Use DisordersR25DA058940 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KIM, MINJEONG, WU, GUORONG · 2023 to 2024
$428k
Longitudinal Analysis of the Dynamic Network Disruptions in Alzheimer's DiseaseR21AG059065 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STYNER, MARTIN ANDREAS, WU, GUORONG · 2018 to 2019
$428k
Understanding the Selective Mechanism of Tau Propagation in Alzheimer's Disease Through Multi-layer Spreading PathwaysR21AG091653 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WU, GUORONG RUDY · 2025 to 2025
$420k
Understanding Mechanism of Functional Dynamics Through An Explainable Neural Network Landscape with Geometric ControlR21AG084375 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WU, GUORONG · 2024 to 2024
$417k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068399NIA NIH HHS R21 AG059065NIA NIH HHS R21 AG084375NIA NIH HHS R21 AG091653NIA NIH HHS R25 AG086105NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG068399NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA058940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An unprecedented amount of existing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data provides a new opportunity to understand how functional fluctuations relate to human cognition/behavior using data-driven approaches. To this end, tremendous efforts have been made in machine learning to decode cognitive states from evolving volumetric images of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals. However, due to the complex nature of brain function, the performance and findings of current deep learning models remain inconsistent across tasks, datasets, and evaluation settings. In this work, by capitalizing on large-scale existing neuroimaging data (39,784 fMRI samples from seven databases), we seek to establish a well-founded empirical guideline for designing deep models in functional neuroimaging by linking the methodology underpinning with neuroscientific understanding. Specifically, we put the spotlight on (1) What is the performance landscape of various models in cognitive task recognition and disease diagnosis? (2) What are the key limitations and trade-offs of current deep models? and (3) What is the general guideline for selecting the suitable machine learning backbone for specific neuroimaging applications? We have conducted comprehensive evaluations and statistical analysis across cognitive and clinical scenarios, to answer the above outstanding questions. Our findings demonstrate that no universal model dominates all scenarios; instead, model effectiveness depends on factors such as demographics, task type, and disease stage. Furthermore, we introduce an attention-based interpretability method to reveal spatial patterns of brain activation associated with tasks and disorders.

Indexed as

BOLD SignalDisease DiagnosisfMRI AnalysisMachine LearningTask Recognition

Identifiers

PMID41737630
PMCPMC12927655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.