ArticleCell biomaterials2025
Comparative analyses for plant virus-based cancer immunotherapy drug development.
Article in Cell biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant-derived nanocarriers & nanostructures for barrier-defined translation: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, targets, and translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- BMV and CCMV-Based Viral Nanoparticles for Delivery ofACS omega · 2026Article
- Virus-like particles based on plant viruses and bacteriophages: emerging strategies for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Plant Viral Vectors for Vaccine Development.Vaccines · 2026Review
- IL-27 promotes Treg cell expression of CD122 and fitness at homeostasis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Structure-function relationship of S protein cleavage in cowpea mosaic virus intratumoral immunotherapy.Biomaterials science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) is a plant virus with potent anti-tumor efficacy. Intratumoral CPMV, but not cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV), reprograms the tumor microenvironment priming durable, systemic anti-tumor immunity. Here, we performed a side-by-side mechanism of action comparison between CPMV and CCMV. Through immune-multiplexing and trafficking studies we observed that CPMV and CCMV are taken up by innate immune cells at similar rates but are processed differently. While CCMV induces proinflammatory interleukins 22, 23, and 27, CPMV is a strong inducer of type I, II, and III interferons, which contribute to the activation and enhancement of immune cell function. We observed that CPMV RNAs activate Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 upon delivery-and not CCMV RNAs; CPMV RNAs persist longer within cells compared with CCMV. Taken together, this work identifies determinants for CPMV's unique mechanism for intratumoral immunotherapy. It also broadens our understanding of the utility of plant viruses for biomedical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.