Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737587›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in transplantation2026

Machine perfusion for liver transplantation: opportunities and challenges for the next generation of transplant surgeons.

Cody L Mullens, Kumaran Shanmugarajah, Glenn K Wakam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cody L MullensDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Kumaran ShanmugarajahDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Glenn K WakamDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine perfusion is reshaping liver transplantation by turning preservation from passive storage into an active, physiologic intervention. This review synthesizes randomized and real-world evidence on hypothermic oxygenated and normothermic approaches and translates these data into practical guidance for training programs. Across studies, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion reduces ischemic biliary injury, especially in donation after circulatory death, while normothermic perfusion lowers early biochemical injury, decreases early allograft dysfunction, and increases organ utilization through ex situ viability testing. Contemporary cohorts show that "back-to-base" workflows can lessen early complications without increasing ninety-day costs, and that extended preservation, often paired with donor-care unit models, shifts many cases into planned daytime surgery. These operational gains matter for education: daytime cases enable rested faculty, deliberate practice, and graded autonomy. Perfusion broadens the case mix, and the pump itself introduces teachable competencies in setup, troubleshooting, and data-driven accept or decline decisions. Challenges include potential erosion of donor procurement experience, uneven access, and a still-evolving science of viability. We propose a competency-based curriculum spanning setup and safety, physiology, assessment and decision-making, and systems leadership, and outline research priorities as an area of inquiry for future transplantation surgeon-scientists in their training. Aligning training with this platform will improve care and strengthen the transplant workforce.

Indexed as

hypothermic machine perfusionliver transplant (LT)machine perfusionnormothermic perfusionnormothermic regional perfusion (NRP)

Identifiers

PMID41737587
PMCPMC12926501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.