ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Epidermal inclusion cyst of the breast: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermal inclusion cysts are nonmalignant proliferations of squamous epithelium situated within the dermis. Their presence in the breast is uncommon and presents considerable diagnostic difficulty. This case report aims to elucidate the multimodal imaging findings and differential diagnosis of a rare breast epidermal inclusion cyst, highlighting its capacity to mimic malignant neoplasms. We present a case of a 38-year-old female with a palpable right breast nodule that had progressively increased over a period of 15 years. A clinical examination identified a firm mass in the upper inner quadrant of the right breast. Ultrasound revealed a heterogeneous solid nodule, whilst mammography detected a sizable, well-defined hyperdense mass (BI-RADS 4). Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a well-defined nodule with T2/STIR hyperintensity, characterized by a ring-like internal enhancement pattern and restricted diffusion, classified as BI-RADS 4. An ultrasound-guided core biopsy was performed, and histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of an epidermal inclusion cyst. This case underscores the importance of considering epidermal inclusion cysts in the differential diagnosis of breast cancers with imaging features to avoid unnecessary invasive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.