ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Efficacy and safety of dinutuximab beta combined with GM-CSF and isotretinoin ± chemotherapy as first-line maintenance treatment for pediatric high-risk neuroblastoma in China.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Real-world evidence on dinutuximab beta for high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) in the Chinese pediatric patients remains limited. This study evaluated clinical efficacy and safety of dinutuximab beta as first-line maintenance therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients newly diagnosed with high-risk NB who after induction and consolidation therapy, received dinutuximab beta combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and isotretinoin, with or without chemotherapy. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR); secondary outcomes included 1- and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, and safety. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included, with a median age of 56 months (range 27-113) at the initiation of dinutuximab beta. Prior to immunotherapy, 14 patients had achieved complete response (CR) and 14 partial response (PR). Among those with CR, the CR maintenance rate was 78.6% (11/14). In patients with PR, the ORR at the end of treatment (EOT) was 64.3% (9/14). Stratified by treatment modality, PR patients receiving dinutuximab beta with chemotherapy had a higher ORR than those treated with dinutuximab beta alone at EOT [70.0% (7/10) vs. 50.0% (2/4)]. Regarding autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) status, all 3 patients who underwent ASCT achieved CR at EOT (ORR: 100%), whereas the ORR among patients without ASCT was 54.5% (6/11). The overall 1-year and 2-year EFS rates were 88.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 67.4-96.1%)] and 72.4% (95% CI, 41.4-88.8%), respectively; 1-year and 2-year OS rates were both 95.8% (95% CI, 73.9-99.4%). Adverse events (AEs) were common but mostly mild to moderate in severity. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred predominantly in patients who received combination chemotherapy, including fever, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Pain was effectively managed with most patients requiring only minimal oral morphine (0.01-0.05 mg/kg/d) during cycles 3-5. Conclusion: Dinutuximab beta shows favorable efficacy for pediatric patients with high-risk NB. Patients treated with prior ASCT or combined with chemotherapy showed trends toward improved response rates and survival outcomes, although optimal treatment regimens required further investigation. AEs are generally manageable, and the use of standardized pain assessment combined with multimodal analgesia has enabled a substantial reduction in morphine exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.