ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Machine learning model for predicting malnutrition risk in lung cancer patients after thoracoscopic resection: a multi-center study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early detection of malnutrition is critical for timely intervention in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracoscopic resection. Existing black-box prediction models lack clinical interpretability, limiting trust and application. The present study was conducted to predict malnutrition risk by establishing an explainable machine learning (ML) model and evaluate the model performance across several sites, so as to develop a web-based application to aid clinical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1, 134 lung cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic resection at Dongguan People's Hospital between October 2021 and October 2024, consisting of a training set (n = 795) and a testing set (n = 339). Meanwhile, an external validation cohort (n=273) was prospectively enrolled at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from March to June of 2025. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to determine the individual risk variables for post-operative malnutrition. This study constructed eight ML models using Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Neural Network, Logistic Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The performance of the established models was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Meanwhile, feature contributions and visualize model outputs were quantified using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to enhance clinical interpretability. Consequently, a web-based risk calculator was created to assist in personalized forecasting. Results: Among 1, 407 total patients, post-operative malnutrition incidence was 11.3% (159/1, 407). Multivariate analysis identified seven independent risk factors: albumin (ALB), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score, age, intraoperative blood loss, total drainage volume, Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) score, and serum potassium (K). The XGBoost model outperformed others, with AUC 0.845 (95% CI: 0.771-0.919) in the testing set and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.841-0.932) in external validation. SHAP analysis clarified the relative importance of risk factors, improving interpretability. Conclusion: The XGBoost-based explainable ML model effectively predicts malnutrition risk in lung cancer patients after thoracoscopic resection. Integrating high predictive performance with interpretability, it supports clinical risk stratification and personalized nutritional interventions to improve post-operative outcomes. A publicly available web-based calculator facilitates easy clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.