Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737326›Full record

ArticleInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026

Exploration of multi-omics liquid biopsy approaches for multi-cancer early detection: The PROMISE study.

Jianchun Duan, Qiang Gao, Zhijie Wang, Jiachen Xu, Yuzi Zhang, Yanan Wang, Xi Yang, Lei Zhang, Yu Xu, Qiaoxia Zhou and 24 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04972201 (The Performance of a Pan-cancer Early Detection Model Based on Liquid Biopsy of Various-omics Biomarkers), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04972201 completednot on this map

The Performance of a Pan-cancer Early Detection Model Based on Liquid Biopsy of Various-omics Biomarkers: a Proof of Concept Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled2,305ConditionsCancerArmsMulti-cancer early detection test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [The Clinical Application and Development of Tumor Biomarkers in China].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Jianchun DuanShanxi Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi 030013, China.
Qiang GaoDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhijie WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, CAMS Key Laboratory of Translational Research on Lung Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Jiachen XuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, CAMS Key Laboratory of Translational Research on Lung Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Yuzi ZhangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Yanan WangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Xi YangDepartment of Oral-Maxillofacial & Head-Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Lei ZhangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Yu XuBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Qiaoxia ZhouBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Bo YangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Xingyu YangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Guoqiang WangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Jing ZhaoBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Xuefei WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Gastric Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Di GeDeptartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Lijie TanDeptartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Wenju ChangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jianmin XuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Pinghong ZhouEndoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Mengjiang HeEndoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yuanlin SongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jie HuShanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Wenhui LouDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Wenchuan WuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Tingyan ShiInstitute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Rongyu ZangInstitute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yuan JiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Sunfang JiangDepartment of Health Management Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Youpei LinDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Liangqing DongDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shangli CaiBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Jia FanDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jie WangShanxi Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi 030013, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation has emerged as the mainstream approach in multi-cancer detection blood tests (MCDBTs), the potential of integrating proteins and mutations, to enhance its performance remains unclear. The PROMISE study (NCT04972201) was conducted to investigate the feasibility of a multi-omics integration strategy in MCDBTs across nine types of cancers in head and neck (excluding nasopharynx), esophagus, lung, stomach, liver, biliary tract, pancreas, colorectum, and ovary. Blood samples were prospectively collected from 1,706 participants (840 non-cancer; 866 cancer) and then randomly divided into training and validation sets. The complementarity between various omics were investigated, and specific omics features were carefully selected for further multimodal model construction. The methylation-based classifier outperformed both the mutation-based and protein-based classifiers. As 95.0% of cancer cases detected by the mutation-based classifier were simultaneously identified by the methylation-based classifier, while 14.0% of the protein-positive samples were missed, protein markers may provide complementary value to the methylation-based classifier. Compared with the methylation-based classifier, the multimodal classifier combining methylation and protein features exhibited an improved sensitivity of 75.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.3%-80.3%) at the same specificity of 98.8% with the accuracy of top predicted origin (TPO1) of 73.1% (95% CI, 66.2%-79.2%). Notably, the TPO1 accuracy reached 100% in liver and ovarian cancers with negative results of the methylation-based classifier. Collectively, these data suggest that the integration of protein markers in the multimodal classifier can offer additional benefits to the methylation-based classifier, particularly in identifying liver and ovarian cancers.

Indexed as

cell-free DNAmethylationmulti-cancer early detectionmutationprotein marker

Identifiers

PMID41737326
PMCPMC12925926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.