ArticleInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026
Mapping the hidden journey of microplastics: Multi-organ deposition patterns and organ-specific health risks revealed by AI-driven analysis.
Article in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Micro- and nanoplastics in human biological materials: a systematic review of detection methods and methodological challenges.Archives of toxicology · 2026Pooled it
- Micro- and nanoplastics in the human genitourinary system: oncological impact - a systematic review.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Developmental Environmental Chronotoxicity by Polystyrene Nanoplastics Exacerbates High-Fat Diet-Induced Pediatric MAFLD Through Circadian Disruption and Mitochondrial Dysfunction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Review
- Current Evidence Linking Microplastic Exposure and Reproductive Cancers.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- Potential risk assessment of different sizes of microplastics on the digestive system of hybrid sturgeon.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2026Article
- Pathogenesis of Micro/Nanoplastics in Mammalian Systems: Gut to Systemic Multi-Organ Dysfunction.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs), pervasive environmental pollutants, have infiltrated human tissues, raising global health concerns. This study investigated the distribution and characteristics of MPs across seven major human organs (lungs, heart, liver, spleen, brain, kidneys, and small intestine) using Raman imaging and machine learning. Tissue samples from eight donors were analyzed for MP presence and characteristics. A deep learning-enhanced U-Net model segmented MPs in Raman images, while a random forest classifier was employed to identify organ-specific MP attribution using 120 imaging features. Animal models supported the systemic distribution of MPs. MPs were ubiquitous across all organs examined. The highest MP abundance was observed in the liver (65.28 ± 23.94 particles/g), small intestine (61.06 ± 25.25 particles/g), and kidneys (58.63 ± 16.50 particles/g). Organ-specific variations in MP characteristics were identified: larger particles dominated the lungs (56.80 ± 57.70 μm), while smaller particles (<10 μm) prevailed in the liver and spleen. Distinct polymer compositions and shape profiles were observed for each organ. The random forest classifier achieved 72.73% accuracy in organ-specific MP attribution. MP abundance was linked to organ vascularity. The findings highlight organ-specific risks of MPs and provide a framework for assessing health impacts, thus guiding targeted interventions to mitigate exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.