ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Multimodal connectivity-based cortical segmentation with graph neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DEEP-LEARNING CORTICAL REGISTRATION GUIDED BY STRUCTURAL AND DIFFUSION MRI AND CONNECTIVITY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2026Article
- DEEP-LEARNING CORTICAL REGISTRATION GUIDED BY STRUCTURAL AND DIFFUSION MRI AND CONNECTIVITY.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Structural connectome analysis using a graph-based deep model for prediction of non-imaging variables.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the significant amount of time and expertise needed for manual segmentation of the brain cortex from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, there is a substantial need for efficient and accurate algorithms to replace the need for human involvement. In this work, we explore the capabilities of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to segment the brain surface based on structural brain connectivity. We train three different GNN architectures, the Graph Convolutional Network (GCN), the Graph Attention Network (GAT), and the Graph U-Net, and evaluate their performances when trained on silver-standard cortical region labels created by FreeSurfer. We take a multimodal approach to brain segmentation by examining the influence of the structural connectivity values inferred from diffusion MRI (dMRI) in addition to using values from structural MRI (sMRI). Our results demonstrate the utility of GNN models, particularly the GAT architecture, which achieved Dice scores competitive to those reported in the literature with non-graph methods. Additionally, structural connectivity derived from dMRI revealed significant value in improving automatic segmentation, as models trained on combined attributes from dMRI and sMRI outperformed those trained only on sMRI. Finally, we compared the GNN-based and the FreeSurfer segmentations in their ability to predict demographic/clinical data, where neither of the two approaches was statistically significantly superior to the other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.