ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
A new approach for assessment of clubfoot treatment using non-radiological scanner coupling finite element.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To develop a new approach for clubfoot treatment assessment using a non-radiological scanner and finite element method (FEM) simulation techniques, which could eliminate the 8% risk of x-ray exposure, as well as evaluate the strain at the Achilles tendon. Methods: The geometry of the clubfoot was acquired by using an optical-light-based scanner. The 3D model was generated from the geometry and exported to finite element simulation software. The contact and large deformation model was established to 13 simulate the angle correction of the Ponseti therapy. The strain and pseudo strain 14 rate were calculated from the simulation results and analysed for assessment. Results: The simulated stress distribution showed the stress concentration around the Achilles tendon, which coincides with the actual situation. The strain and pseudo strain rate were analysed with the correction angle, which matches the three-stage casting of Ponseti therapy. The result suggested the intermediate angle correction casting was 40% and 87% of the correction process. The recommended correction angles for coronal, axial, and sagittal axes were α = 17.2°, β = -2°, and γ = 13.2° for the first casting, and α = 35.6°, β = -4.4°, and γ = 25.4° for the second casting. Conclusion: Using the proposed approach has led to good correlation between the simulation results and the actual situation. It was feasible to use a non-radiological scanner coupled with FEM to evaluate the clubfoot treatment, which eliminates the risk of x-ray exposure for infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.