ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Telitacicept for refractory AChR-positive generalized myasthenia gravis: a retrospective real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telitacicept in refractory juvenile generalized myasthenia gravis: a case report and collective analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Research Progress in Pharmacological Targeted Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Treating refractory acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG) remains challenging, especially for patients requiring long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Current treatments often lack specificity and pose significant long-term risks, underscoring the need for alternatives. Telitacicept, a novel dual inhibitor of B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), offers a promising targeted therapeutic approach. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in the treatment of refractory AChR+ generalized myasthenia gravis. Methods: This retrospective study included 42 patients with refractory AChR+ gMG who received telitacicept. The primary outcomes assessed were changes from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores, analyzed using mixed-effects models. Secondary outcomes comprised cumulative response rates, reductions in concomitant immunosuppressive medications, and safety events. Results: A total of 42 refractory MG patients with MGFA class II-IV were enrolled. Significant improvements were observed in the QMG total score (least-squares [LS] mean change at month 5: -2.24, 95% CI -3.34 to -1.15, p<0.001), with sustained benefits across ocular, limb, and bulbar areas. Cumulative response rates reached 69.9% for MGFA-PIS and 73.8% for QMG improvement (≥3-point reduction) by 6 months. Notable decreases in prednisone (LS mean -10.17 mg/day, p<0.001) and immunosuppressant use were also seen. The therapy demonstrated a promising safety profile. Conclusions: Telitacicept demonstrated significant efficacy in refractory AChR+ gMG and may reduce dependence on traditional immunosuppressants. These real-world findings support its use as a valuable treatment choice for this challenging patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.