Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737191›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026

Adapting the modified WHO safety checklist for non-operating room anesthesia: A Quality improvement project.

Faraz Mansoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Faraz MansoorDr. Faraz Mansoor, FCPS (Anesthesia), FCPS (Critical Care Medicine) Consultant Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesia, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Objective: Patient safety checklists are established tools for reducing preventable errors in clinical practice. The use of World Health Organization (WHO) safety checklist outside the operating room environment remains inconsistent. This audit was conducted to assess compliance with the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) standards. Methodology: A prospective audit by the anesthesia team was carried out in the Radiology Department of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar. All patients receiving sedation for CT, MRI, or PET scans in February 2023 were included (n=30). Data sources included patient records, resuscitation equipment logs, drug inventory checks, staff training records, and direct observations. Standards were benchmarked against Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) recommendations. Audit findings were presented to the Quality Council, and a modified WHO safety checklist specific to radiology was developed and implemented. A re-audit was latter conducted in March-April 2024 which included 55 patients. Results: Baseline data demonstrated compliance with all RCR standards except for the use of a safety checklist, which was absent in all 30 cases. In response, a concise modified WHO checklist was introduced, incorporating high-risk patient identification and independent double-checking of medications. The re-audit showed 100% compliance across all RCR indicators, including checklist use, in 55 patients. Conclusion: The adaptation of the modified WHO safety checklist for radiology enhanced compliance with international safety standards and closed previously identified gaps. Regular clinical audits and the incorporation of tailored checklists can strengthen patient safety in non-operating room anesthesia.

Indexed as

Clinical AuditRadiologySafety checklistSedationWHO Patient Safety

Identifiers

PMID41737191
PMCPMC12927146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.