ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Contraceptive implant continuation among postpartum women at tertiary care center.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the continuation rates and factors influencing the discontinuation of postpartum etonorgestrel contraceptive implants over a three-year period. Methodology: A prospective cohort study was conducted from November 2017 to December 2022 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Services Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. The patients coming to OPD and emergency were counselled for insertion of long-acting reversible contraception. Those who opted for postpartum etonorgestrel implants were enrolled after informed consent and implant was placed within 48 hours of birth. The patients were followed for three years post insertion. The primary outcome was the continuation rate at three years, and secondary outcomes included reasons for discontinuation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Of 424 participants the cumulative continuation rates for year 1,2 and 3 were 91.9%, 82.7% and 75% respectively and 106 (25%) removals at the end of year 3. Doctors counselling played role in choosing implant in 177(41.7%) patients. Continuation was higher among women with prior contraceptive knowledge AOR: 3.73; 95% CI (1.20-6.21), previous contraceptive use AOR: 8.1; 95%CI (4.2-31.1), and antenatal counselling AOR: 2.24; 95% CI (1.16-3.54). The most common reasons for discontinuation were side effects in 77(45.2%) and family pressure 55(32.3%) patients. Women with no side effects were 18 times more likely to continue AOR: 18.1; 95% CI (7.5-48). Conclusion: The postpartum insertion of etonorgestrel implant has high continuation rates. Side effects of bleeding irregularities and family pressure were main reasons for discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.