Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737110›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Comparative Study of Blood Loss and Hemostasis in Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation Versus Open Hemorrhoidectomy.

Muhammad Usama Talib, Faiza Hameed, Qambar A Laghari, Zameer Hussain Laghari, Aijaz Ahmed Shaikh, Renad Al Mefleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Usama TalibGeneral Surgery, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Kendal, GBR.
Faiza HameedGeneral Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK.
Qambar A LaghariSurgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK.
Zameer Hussain LaghariGeneral Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK.
Aijaz Ahmed ShaikhGeneral Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK.
Renad Al MeflehPediatrics, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Amman, JOR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Hemorrhoidal disease is among the most commonly seen anorectal disorders. Surgical treatment is routinely indicated in advanced stages or when conservative measures fail. Although conventional open hemorrhoidectomy remains an effective procedure, it is often accompanied by considerable intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hemorrhagic complications. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) is a minimally invasive approach that targets the arterial supply of hemorrhoidal tissue and has been proposed to improve hemostatic control. This study aimed to compare intraoperative blood loss and bleeding-related outcomes between DGHAL and open hemorrhoidectomy. Methods This prospective, observational, non-randomized comparative study was conducted from March 2023 to February 2025 at Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan. Adults aged 18-65 years with grade II-IV hemorrhoids were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Grade II cases were included only after documented failure of conservative therapy or rubber band ligation, or in the presence of recurrent bleeding, symptomatic prolapse, or hemorrhoid-related anemia. Patients underwent Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) or open hemorrhoidectomy according to predefined institutional protocols; allocation was non-random and based on disease severity, prolapse extent, bleeding severity, patient preference, and Doppler availability. Intraoperative blood loss was measured using suction volume and sponge weight difference. Additional hemostatic intervention was defined as persistent bleeding lasting >30 seconds or visible arterial spurting requiring sutures or electrocautery. Clinically significant postoperative bleeding was recorded within 24 hours and 14 days. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) with multivariable regression adjustment. Results A total of 140 patients were analyzed, with 70 individuals in each treatment group. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. The mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in patients undergoing DGHAL compared with those treated by open hemorrhoidectomy (32.4 ± 14.8 mL vs 68.9 ± 22.6 mL; p < 0.001). Patients in the DGHAL group required fewer supplementary hemostatic interventions and had significantly shorter operative times (p < 0.001). Both early and late postoperative bleeding events occurred less frequently following DGHAL, and the reduction in postoperative hemoglobin levels was also significantly smaller (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the type of surgical procedure as the most significant independent determinant of blood loss. Conclusion Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation was associated with significantly lower intraoperative blood loss and improved short-term hemostatic outcomes compared to open hemorrhoidectomy. These findings support DGHAL as an effective alternative for achieving better perioperative bleeding control; however, they reflect short-term hemostatic advantages rather than overall procedural superiority.

Indexed as

hemorrhoidal diseaseintraoperative bleedingminimally invasive surgerypostoperative hemorrhagesurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41737110
PMCPMC12926782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.