ReviewCureus2026
Augmented Reality-Enhanced Simulation in Surgical Education: A Scoping Review of Implementation, Skill Retention, and Equity in Low-Resource Settings.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many developments have been made to enhance surgical training, including the usage of augmented reality (AR) simulation. However, its implementation within surgical training programs, impact on skill retention, and applicability in low-resource settings remain unclear. A scoping review was used to explore the role of AR technology and its implementation in surgical education, maintenance of skill retention, and equity and access in low-resource settings. A systematic search was conducted across four databases, which yielded 185 records, of which 30 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were published after 2019 and evaluated AR interventions in simulated environments involving medical students or residents. AR intervention was primarily used for visual guidance, telestration and image overlay. Evidence for skill retention remains limited, with only four studies assessing retention outcomes. Short-term improvements in task performance and procedural planning were reported, while skills transfer to clinical environments and long-term retention remain underexplored. Several studies created low-resource, reusable AR systems, reporting increased learner confidence and procedural knowledge; however, these studies were limited by small sample sizes and a reliance on subjective outcome measures. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that AR has the potential to become a useful tool for surgical education. However, the literature remains preliminary, with more longitudinal, objective and equity-focused studies required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.