Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737089›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Aortic Dissection Mimicking Myocardial Infarction: The Diagnostic Value of Point-of-Care Echocardiography.

Grahith Pai Baidebettu, Ayman Helal, Mohammed El-Din, Ibrahim Antoun

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grahith Pai BaidebettuInternal Medicine, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, GBR.
Ayman HelalCardiology, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, GBR.
Mohammed El-DinCardiology, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, GBR.
Ibrahim AntounCardiology, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening condition often misdiagnosed due to its varied presentation and symptom overlap with more common emergencies. This delay in diagnosis significantly increases morbidity and mortality. We report the case of a 53-year-old man with a history of hypertension who presented with central chest pain and was initially diagnosed with an inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction based on electrocardiographic findings. During cardiac catheterisation, difficulty in engaging the right coronary artery was noted, prompting a bedside transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), which revealed a Stanford Type A AD extending from the aortic root to the abdominal aorta. The patient experienced ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest but was successfully resuscitated and immediately transferred for surgical repair. His postoperative course was complicated by multifocal cerebral infarcts requiring prolonged ventilatory support and tracheostomy. This case highlights the crucial importance of maintaining a high clinical suspicion for AD, particularly when initial presentations are atypical or defy conventional diagnostic algorithms. We emphasise the pivotal role of early point-of-care echocardiography in rapidly confirming the diagnosis, thereby reducing delays to life-saving interventions. This significantly improves patient outcomes even in complex clinical scenarios. We also provide a practical guide for frontline clinicians to diagnose Type A AD using transthoracic echocardiography.

Indexed as

aortic dissectionbedside echocardiographydiagnostic challengepoint-of-care-ultrasoundstemi mimickers

Identifiers

PMID41737089
PMCPMC12928253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.