Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41737062›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2026

Scientific knowledge graph and ontology generation using open large language models.

Alexandru Oarga, Matthew Hart, Andres M Bran, Magdalena Lederbauer, Philippe Schwaller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandru OargaLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL Switzerland philippe.schwaller@epfl.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4432-3667
Matthew HartLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL Switzerland philippe.schwaller@epfl.ch.
Andres M BranLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL Switzerland philippe.schwaller@epfl.ch.
Magdalena LederbauerLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL Switzerland philippe.schwaller@epfl.ch.
Philippe SchwallerLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), ISIC, EPFL Switzerland philippe.schwaller@epfl.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge graphs (KGs) are powerful tools for structured information modeling, increasingly recognized for their potential to enhance the factuality and reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, in scientific domains, KG representation is often constrained by the absence of ontologies capable of modeling complex hierarchies and relationships inherent in the data. Moreover, the manual curation of KGs and ontologies from scientific literature remains a time-intensive task typically performed by domain experts. This work proposes a novel method leveraging LLMs for zero-shot, end-to-end ontology, and KG generation from scientific literature; implemented exclusively using open-source LLMs. We evaluate our approach by assessing its ability to reconstruct an existing KG and ontology of chemical elements and functional groups. Furthermore, we apply the method to the emerging field of Single Atom Catalysts (SACs), where information is scarce and unstructured. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in automatically generating structured knowledge representations from complex scientific literature in areas where manual curation is challenging or time-consuming. The generated ontologies and KGs provide a foundation for improved information retrieval and reasoning in specialized fields, opening new avenues for LLM-assisted scientific research and knowledge management.

Identifiers

PMID41737062
PMCPMC12928120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.