ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
The realism of behavioral theory-based vs. non-theory-based AI agents during a simulated infant formula shortage.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: AI-driven digital twins and autonomous AI agents are increasingly used to simulate human behavior during crises. Incorporating behavioral science frameworks may improve agent realism, but this practice is still in its infancy. This research evaluates the realism of behavioral theory-based agents in a controlled experimental design. Methods: Using a simulated infant formula shortage in South Dallas County, we compare two conditions: one with theory-based agents, and another without. Participants (human raters) assessed the perceived realism of agent decisions across both conditions. Results: Results showed significantly higher realism ratings for the theory-based agents, supporting our hypothesis. Discussion: This study constitutes an early effort to assess behavioral theory in simulation frameworks and establish a repeatable method for assessing behavioral fidelity. It provides policymakers and researchers with a theory-informed approach for enhancing AI agent realism, with the goal of increasing trust in digital twin models used for decision support in high-stakes environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.