ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Precision cotton disease detection via transformer models applied to leaf imagery.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is great potential for improving agricultural research, ecological monitoring, and biodiversity conservation through computerized plant species cataloging utilizing leaf photos. This work introduces a deep learning-based framework that uses transformer-based architectures, such as the Vanilla Vision Transformer (ViT), Swin Transformer, DeiT (Data-Efficient Image Transformer), and T2T-ViT (Tokens-to-Tokens Vision Transformer), to automatically classify cotton leaf diseases. Images of cotton leaves from four different classes-curl virus, bacterial blight, fusarium wilt, and healthy leaves-make up the dataset. A stratified K-fold hold-out testing technique (K = 1 to 5) is used to maintain the class distribution across training and testing folds in order to guarantee robust model evaluation and address class imbalance. To improve generalization and guarantee compatibility with transformer models, standard image augmentation and normalizing approaches are used. All models begin training using vast collections of images, afterward honed specifically on cotton leaf data to sharpen their ability to tell differences apart. Results spread across multiple test rounds stay steady, one standout reaching nearly perfect accuracy-99.99 percent. This pattern highlights how transformer-driven systems thrive alongside stratified K-fold checks, crafting a dependable way to spot crop issues early, shifting farm oversight toward quicker, smarter responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.