Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736933›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Patient-specific fine-tuning of a self-distilled transformer model for normal tissue segmentation in abdominal magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiotherapy.

Nicolas Côté, Jue Jiang, Sharif Elguindi, Marsha Reyngold, Christopher Crane, Ifeanyirochukwu Onochie, Harini Veeraraghavan, Arthur Lalonde, Neelam Tyagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicolas CôtéMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jue JiangMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sharif ElguindiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marsha ReyngoldMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher CraneMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ifeanyirochukwu OnochieMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Harini VeeraraghavanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Arthur LalondeDépartement de physique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Neelam TyagiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Artificial Intelligence powered virtual digital twins to construct and validate AI automated tools for safer MR-guided adaptive RT of abdominal cancersR01EB032825 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Neelam Tyagi, Harini Veeraraghavan · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Accurate segmentation of organs-at-risk is critical for adaptive Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in upper gastrointestinal (GI) treatments. Large anatomical variations pose challenges for automated segmentation methods, requiring considerable manual editing. Our goal was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of patient-specific (PS) fine-tuning of a pretrained transformer model for segmenting upper GI structures. Materials and Methods: A PS fine-tuning approach was implemented by adapting a pretrained transformer model called Self-distilled Masked Image Transformer (SMIT). SMIT was trained using T2-weighted MR images from 30 patients with pancreatic cancers who underwent MRgRT to create a general model (GM). This GM was subsequently adapted to each new individual patient using data from their first treatment fraction, producing a PS model. Its performance was evaluated across the subsequent treatment fractions in 10 patients using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and added path length (APL) by comparing against expert delineations. Results: PS model outperformed the GM across all structures, with the largest improvements for duodenum-stomach (DSC: 0.84 to 0.90, HD95: 15.9 to 4.9 mm). This approach reduced potential contour editing efforts, decreasing median APL by 4%, 7% and 26% for large bowel, small bowel, and duodenum-stomach. Conclusion: PS fine-tuning was most effective for scans with low soft-tissue contrast and challenging anatomy. This method provides a practical, computationally feasible approach to enhance online adaptive workflow by improving segmentation accuracy and potentially reducing the need for manual editing that overall improves on-table treatment times.

Indexed as

Fine-TuningMR-LinacPatient-specific modelsPretrained transformer networksSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41736933
PMCPMC12926581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.