ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Patient-specific fine-tuning of a self-distilled transformer model for normal tissue segmentation in abdominal magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and the Global Radiotherapy Gap.JCO global oncology · 2026Article
- AI-Based Dose Compliance of Secondary Organs at Risk in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Accurate segmentation of organs-at-risk is critical for adaptive Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in upper gastrointestinal (GI) treatments. Large anatomical variations pose challenges for automated segmentation methods, requiring considerable manual editing. Our goal was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of patient-specific (PS) fine-tuning of a pretrained transformer model for segmenting upper GI structures. Materials and Methods: A PS fine-tuning approach was implemented by adapting a pretrained transformer model called Self-distilled Masked Image Transformer (SMIT). SMIT was trained using T2-weighted MR images from 30 patients with pancreatic cancers who underwent MRgRT to create a general model (GM). This GM was subsequently adapted to each new individual patient using data from their first treatment fraction, producing a PS model. Its performance was evaluated across the subsequent treatment fractions in 10 patients using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and added path length (APL) by comparing against expert delineations. Results: PS model outperformed the GM across all structures, with the largest improvements for duodenum-stomach (DSC: 0.84 to 0.90, HD95: 15.9 to 4.9 mm). This approach reduced potential contour editing efforts, decreasing median APL by 4%, 7% and 26% for large bowel, small bowel, and duodenum-stomach. Conclusion: PS fine-tuning was most effective for scans with low soft-tissue contrast and challenging anatomy. This method provides a practical, computationally feasible approach to enhance online adaptive workflow by improving segmentation accuracy and potentially reducing the need for manual editing that overall improves on-table treatment times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.