ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Effects of breath-hold reproducibility on proton and photon lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Breath-hold can mitigate respiratory motion in lung cancer radiotherapy. Reduced motion could be especially beneficial for proton therapy which is more sensitive to geometrical perturbations than photon therapy. However, failure to reproduce the breath-hold tumor position could lessen this advantage. In this study, effects of reproducibility were investigated for 3D and 4D robust optimized proton and photon therapy. Materials and methods: Fourteen patients with early stage lung cancer, imaged with a single breath-hold computed tomography, were included. Reproducibility variations were included in the treatment planning and simulated with image deformations. Further, additional larger variations were included in the evaluation.Three photon and three proton therapy treatment plans were robustly optimized for the same intended dose and compared using probabilistic evaluation. One 3D method only accounted for patient shifts. A second 3D method accounted for breath-hold variations using larger patient shifts. The final 4D method used additional planning images. Results: Protons resulted in reduced dose to organs of interest but with higher spread in target dose compared with photons. Mean heart dose was reduced, 90% probability of 6.7 Gy with photons compared with 0.3 Gy for protons for 4D planning. Decreased reproducibility affected tumor dose ranges. However, the 90% probability of median tumor dose remained stable. Conclusions: Reduction in dose to organs of interest was demonstrated with proton therapy. Using 4D compared with 3D optimization did not result in more robust plans. Larger breath-hold variability than anticipated during planning had a minor effect on the target dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.