ArticleFerroptosis and oxidative stress2026
Best practices for cysteine analysis.
Article in Ferroptosis and oxidative stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein persulfidation in plants: a central regulator of multiple signaling pathways.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method to quantify total Coenzyme A concentration and isotopic labeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate measurement of cysteine and related thiol-containing metabolites is essential for understanding cellular redox regulation. However, the intrinsic reactivity and instability of cysteine present substantial analytical challenges. This review summarizes the biochemical context of cysteine and glutathione metabolism, emphasizing their dynamic redox equilibria and physiological relevance. We critically examine existing analytical approaches, including mass spectrometry-based, enzyme-coupled, and colorimetric methods, and discuss their respective strengths and limitations. Particular attention is given to sample preparation, derivatization strategies, and reagent selection, as these steps are crucial for preserving native thiol-disulfide status. Among various alkylating agents, N-ethylmaleimide is identified as the most reliable for thiol stabilization in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) workflows, while specific reagents such as monobromobimane or β-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl iodoacetamide (HPE-IAM) are required for persulfide and polysulfide detection. The review also highlights the pitfalls of using indirect surrogates-such as glutathione or cystathionine levels-to infer cysteine availability, which can lead to significant misinterpretation of metabolic states. We conclude that direct LC-MS-based quantification of cysteine and glutathione, combined with careful derivatization and sample handling, remains the most reliable and accurate approach currently available for the assessment of thiol metabolism and redox homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.