ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
From the perspective of spatial justice and temporal justice a study on social stratification of physical activity participation among Chinese residents-empirical analysis based on CGSS2023.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Physical activity is one of the important ways to promote public health and implement the "Healthy China" strategy. Currently, physical activity has become an evident difference in participation between various social classes; this is becoming a key part of inequality in health. The purpose of this study is to explore how social stratification affects Chinese residents' participation in physical activities, so provide a theoretical basis for formulating more fair and effective public health policies. Methods: This study provides an analytical framework from the three dimensions of space, time and capital. The 2023 China General Social Survey (CGSS) data with a sample size of 2129 is taken for ordered logistic regression model to explore how social stratification affects residents' participation in physical activities through various channels. This method systematically investigates how independent and interactive effects of various social factors affect physical activity frequency. Results: 1) Significant spatial gradient effect: residents' physical activity frequency shows a systematic increase from the countryside, towns, urban fringes to the center of the city. 2) Time constraints are everywhere: For every hour more you work, exercise becomes less across all regions; 3) Cultural capital makes a big difference: Controlling for income, education years show strong positive effect on physical activity even after that; 4) The "gym paradox" was found - people who regularly use gyms for exercise actually do the least amount of exercise. Discussion: This study shows the various levels of mechanisms through which social stratification affects participation in physical activities. Spatial differences are not only the "compositional effect" of socioeconomic factors but also an independent "contextual effect" caused by uneven built environments and public service provision. "Time poverty" is now a general form of social constraint that cuts across different geographical boundaries, while the transcendent power of cultural capital proves that Bourdieu's theory is applicable to health behavior studies, revealing the cultural reproduction mechanism behind health inequality. Discovery of the 'gym paradox' challenges the simplistic assumption that commercialised fitness is equivalent to modern sporting participation, suggesting instead that we need to reconsider what place there might be for localised forms of exercise which are oriented around lifestyles as part of a national programme on fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.