Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Shaping futures through gendered lenses: secondary school students' perceptions on gender roles and career choices.

Zeynep Demirtaş, Aynur Rabia Özbek, Ömer Faruk Vural

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Qualitative research - Part 1.Perspectives in clinical research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeynep DemirtaşSakarya University, Faculty of Education, Department of Education Sciences, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Aynur Rabia ÖzbekSakarya University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Education Sciences, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Ömer Faruk VuralSakarya University, Faculty of Education, Department of Education Sciences, Sakarya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The qualitative research study aims to determine secondary school students' perceptions of how gender roles affect their career choices. Methods: In this study, the qualitative research design "phenomenology" was used. The study group was determined according to the maximum diversity sampling technique, one of the purposeful sampling methods. The study group consisted of 100 students attending different types of secondary schools in the province of Sakarya. A semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers was used as the data collection tool in the study. This form consisted of four sections: demographic information, educational information, questions related to career preferences, and gender roles. Content analysis was used to analyze the data, and student opinions were included. Results: The study's findings revealed that the students' thoughts and perceptions were consistent with traditional gender roles and that this effect was evident in their career choices. Male students want to work in a profession that offers high pay and career opportunities. In contrast, female students want to work in a profession that does not interfere with their domestic responsibilities, especially motherhood. The students who participated in the study believe they will be more successful and more easily employed in occupational groups associated with traditional gender roles in the workplace. Discussion: The students explained their career choices within the same frameworks and boundaries, using traditional gender perceptions.

Indexed as

career choicesgender rolesoccupational preferencesocial norms and employmenttraditional gender perceptions

Identifiers

PMID41736882
PMCPMC12926383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.