Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A unifying account of loss aversion and loneliness: from neurocognitive bases to affective dysfunction.

Maria Arioli, Zaira Cattaneo, Nicola Canessa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria ArioliDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Zaira CattaneoDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Nicola CanessaIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this perspective paper we advance the hypothesis that loss aversion (the general tendency to weigh losses significantly more than equivalent gains) and loneliness (the distress arising from perceived social deficiency and isolation) share a fundamental basis in negativity bias and partially overlapping neuro-cognitive mechanisms. Although traditionally studied separately, we argue that both phenomena reflect heightened sensitivity to negative information, expressed in distinctive attentional and expectancy biases, and in opposite response patterns in striatal and insular neural systems processing rewards and negative affects, respectively. Moreover, both phenomena are associated with individual differences in emotion regulation and cognitive control, reflected in altered amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity. We propose that - when exacerbated - these shared behavioral and neural patterns may contribute to the affective dysfunction observed in depression, thereby helping explain the robust association of this condition with both loss aversion and loneliness. By integrating evidence from experimental psychology, cognitive neuroscience and clinical research, we outline the shared underpinnings of loss aversion and loneliness while also delineating their theoretical and experimental differences. This unified framework offers novel insights into the cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting self-preservation, and motivates future interdisciplinary investigation linking decision-making with social attitudes and interactions.

Indexed as

interventionlonelinessloss aversionnegativity biasself-preservationtreatment

Identifiers

PMID41736875
PMCPMC12926140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.