Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736853›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

The ability to drive cortical networks in the low gamma range differs between sexes.

Aurimas Mockevičius, Inga Griškova-Bulanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aurimas MockevičiusVilnius University, Institute of Bioscience, Life Sciences Center, Saulėtekio Ave. 7, Vilnius 10257, Lithuania.
Inga Griškova-BulanovaVilnius University, Institute of Bioscience, Life Sciences Center, Saulėtekio Ave. 7, Vilnius 10257, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain's ability to synchronize with periodic auditory stimuli is widely used to study gamma-range neural activity. Chirp-like stimulation, covering a broad frequency range, elicits envelope-following responses (ERFs) that enable assessment across multiple frequencies and estimation of the individual gamma frequency (IGF). However, the impact of sex differences on EFR remains understudied. We compared auditory ERFs in the 30-60 Hz range between females and males. Electroencephalography was recorded in 80 healthy young adults (42 females; 26.07 ± 4.28 years) using chirp-like auditory stimulation. Females were tested during the early follicular phase to minimize hormonal effects. Phase-locking index (PLI) and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) were analyzed across nine fronto-central electrodes. Females showed significantly lower PLI (35-43 Hz) and ERSP (35-46 Hz), while IGFs were comparable. These results emphasize sex-related influences on gamma auditory responses and the need for sex-specific normative baselines in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Cognitive neuroscienceNeuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41736853
PMCPMC12927311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.