Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736839›Full record

ReviewAustralian prescriber2026

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (viscosupplementation) for osteoarthritis: is it effective?

Huai Leng Pisaniello, Shyan Goh, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian prescriber, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huai Leng PisanielloMusculoskeletal Health and Wiser Health Care Units, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0425-1697
Shyan GohMusculoskeletal Health and Wiser Health Care Units, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-2624
Rachelle BuchbinderMusculoskeletal Health and Wiser Health Care Units, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-0933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viscosupplementation with intra-articular hyaluronic acid derivatives and cross-linked polymers of hyaluronic acid is increasingly used to treat symptomatic osteoarthritis in the knee, hip and other joints. Most guidelines conditionally recommend against its use to treat knee osteoarthritis, and strongly or conditionally recommend against its use for other joints, indicating a large evidence-to-practice gap. Conclusive evidence from randomised placebo-controlled trials indicates that intra-articular hyaluronic acid provides no important benefits for people with knee (and other joints) osteoarthritis, and may have potentially serious harms including septic arthritis and severe inflammatory joint and cutaneous reactions. Use of computed tomography scans to guide hyaluronic acid injection exposes the patient to unnecessary radiation and has an unwarranted financial and environmental cost. When the topic arises in clinical practice, prescribers should use a shared decision-making approach that includes an explanation as to why hyaluronic acid injection is not recommended care for osteoarthritis and offer alternatives, taking into consideration the patient's values and preferences.

Indexed as

hyaluronic acidintra-articular injectionsosteoarthritisviscosupplementation

Identifiers

PMID41736839
PMCPMC12928838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.