ArticleBMJ public health2026
Employment among individuals with work disabilities before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: results of a longitudinal cohort study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigates the longitudinal trajectory of employment prospects, before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic for individuals with work disabilities in the Netherlands. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study using monthly administrative data between 2018 and 2022 on work and income from all Dutch individuals with a registered work disability in December 2019. Monthly employment probabilities were modelled with longitudinal multivariate Generalised Estimating Equations analysis, where the dependent binomial variable was 'employment status'. Employment prospects in permanent versus flexible contracts were estimated as two potential outcomes. We stratified our analyses by sex, age, educational attainment, migration background and sector. Results: Our cohort consisted of 476 617 individuals. Employment probabilities gradually increased between 2018 and 2019, but substantially decreased in the year of the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly in flexible contracts. Strikingly, these downturns took place before the start of lockdowns in March 2020. Especially older aged workers (55-63 year) and workers with lower educational attainment were confronted with a lower likelihood of being employed during the first year of the pandemic. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the lower employment probabilities seem not to be solely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is likely that the introduction of new Dutch regulations for employers, effective from 1 January 2020, has strongly decreased the number of workers with work disabilities in flexible contracts. Further research will need to determine whether such effects align with those in the total working population or were restricted to individuals with work disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.