Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736808›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Qualitative exploration of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in Sierra Leone: do the 'trusted messengers' trust the vaccine?

Ifeolu David, Enid Schatz, Wilson Majee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ifeolu DavidPopulation Health Leadership and Analytics, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-8084
Enid SchatzGraduate School, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Wilson MajeeHealth Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy is a global issue, and the important role of healthcare workers in addressing vaccine hesitancy is well documented. However, there is limited theory-guided research on the uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations among healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examined COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in Sierra Leone and assessed the relevance of the 5C model-which posits that vaccine uptake is shaped by confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation and collective responsibility-in explaining their vaccination attitudes, intentions and behaviours. Methods: 24 indepth interviews were conducted in 2022 with healthcare workers in Freetown, Makeni and Kenema. The resulting narratives were thematically analysed to identify factors that promoted or deterred COVID-19 vaccination. Findings: Key facilitators of COVID-19 vaccine uptake included positive views on adult vaccines, self-protection and the desire to be role models. Major barriers were complacency, distrust in available vaccines and safety concerns. Additionally, participants' perspectives were informed by their Conclusions: This paper examines social determinants of vaccine uptake and offers policy recommendations to enhance vaccine uptake among trusted messengers in the region, thereby supporting global COVID-19 recovery and improving LMIC preparedness for future outbreaks. Future responses to public health emergencies in LMICs should be informed by local contextual experiences, and vaccine programmes must consider these factors during planning and implementation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthVaccination

Identifiers

PMID41736808
PMCPMC12927351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.