Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736805›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Approach to large thrombus burden in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Rohit Mody, Debabrata Dash, Bhavya Mody, Umanshi Dash, Rajeev Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohit ModyDepartment of Cardiology, Mody Harvard Cardiac Institute & Research Centre, Krishna Super Specialty Hospital, Bathinda, India.
Debabrata DashDepartment of Cardiology, Aster Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Bhavya ModyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Resident Doctor, Trinity Health Hospital, Livonia, MI, United States.
Umanshi DashDepartment of Cardiology, Mody Harvard Cardiac Institute & Research Centre, Krishna Super Specialty Hospital, Bathinda, India.
Rajeev GuptaDepartment of Cardiology, Spectrum Medical Center and Burjeel Royal Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) is the preferred treatment. However, High Thrombus Burden (HTB), defined by extensive thrombus in the Infarct-Related Artery (IRA), particularly with "cut-off" occlusion patterns and large vessel diameter (>3.5 mm), presents a major challenge. Despite the use of effective anticoagulation, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT), HTB remains a significant obstacle. It is associated with complications such as no/slow reflow and distal embolization, leading to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Accurate assessment using angiographic features and MI thrombus grading is essential before choosing a therapeutic strategy. Management options include mechanical thrombectomy, aspiration, parenteral/oral antiplatelets, intracoronary thrombolytics, and stenting approaches like direct stenting. Success depends on tailored, scenario-specific application of these therapies. This review highlights current strategies to manage HTB during PPCI.

Indexed as

distal embolizationhigh thrombus burdenpercutaneous coronary interventionST-elevation myocardial infarctionthrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID41736805
PMCPMC12926434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.