ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2026
Causal deep learning to personalize medicine: Which intensive care patients with sepsis will benefit from corticosteroid therapy?
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A clinician's guide to corticosteroid therapy in pneumonia and critical illness: agent selection, dosing, monitoring, and interactions.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to dysregulated host response to an infection, often requiring intensive care treatment. There is a strong rationale for the administration of corticosteroids for immunomodulation; however, clinical trials are inconclusive, which may be attributable to heterogeneity in therapeutic effects between individual patients. Leveraging deep learning within a causality framework, we aimed to identify for which intensive care patients with sepsis corticosteroids lead to improved survival. Methods: We trained the treatment agnostic representation network (TARNet) to estimate the reduction in predicted probability of 28-day mortality following initiation of corticosteroid treatment of intensive care patients with sepsis. We used the freely available and public AmsterdamUMCdb ICU database for causal model development, considering 19 predictor variables from the first 24 h of admission, and validated the model with Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) version 2.2 data. A cut-off of 10% reduction in predicted probability of mortality was used to classify treatment responders. Results: According to the Sepsis-3 criteria, a total of 2920 admissions in AmsterdamUMCdb were eligible. Of these, 1378 were assigned to the intervention group and 1542 to the control group. Internal validation of predictions of the observed outcomes showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79, while external validation yielded an AUROC of 0.71. Covariate balance of the TARNet model latent representation, as measured by the Wasserstein distance, was 3.6 × 10⁻⁷ for the internal data set and 4.2 × 10⁻⁷ for the external data set. Based on the estimated reduction of predicted mortality, a distinction was made between treatment responders ( Conclusions: Corticosteroid treatment responders were those with severe metabolic acidosis and impaired circulation, whereas patients who were less ill based on these parameters were more likely to have increased mortality rates by corticosteroid treatment. There was also a notable discrepancy between the model's suggestions and the physicians' treatment that was carried out, implying improvements in the clinical assessment of patients with sepsis are necessary. Given recent years have not yielded new treatments for sepsis, computational clinical decision-support systems are worth exploring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.