Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736785›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2026

Causal deep learning to personalize medicine: Which intensive care patients with sepsis will benefit from corticosteroid therapy?

Ameet Jagesar, Louk Smalbil, Etienne Galea, Tristan Struja, Tariq Dam, Paul Hilders, Martijn Otten, Laurens Biesheuvel, Armand Girbes, Patrick Thoral and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ameet JagesarDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Louk SmalbilQuantitative Data Analytics Group, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Etienne GaleaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tristan StrujaMedical University Clinic, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Tariq DamDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul HildersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn OttenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurens BiesheuvelDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Armand GirbesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick ThoralDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark HoogendoornQuantitative Data Analytics Group, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence (C4I), Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AII), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to dysregulated host response to an infection, often requiring intensive care treatment. There is a strong rationale for the administration of corticosteroids for immunomodulation; however, clinical trials are inconclusive, which may be attributable to heterogeneity in therapeutic effects between individual patients. Leveraging deep learning within a causality framework, we aimed to identify for which intensive care patients with sepsis corticosteroids lead to improved survival. Methods: We trained the treatment agnostic representation network (TARNet) to estimate the reduction in predicted probability of 28-day mortality following initiation of corticosteroid treatment of intensive care patients with sepsis. We used the freely available and public AmsterdamUMCdb ICU database for causal model development, considering 19 predictor variables from the first 24 h of admission, and validated the model with Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) version 2.2 data. A cut-off of 10% reduction in predicted probability of mortality was used to classify treatment responders. Results: According to the Sepsis-3 criteria, a total of 2920 admissions in AmsterdamUMCdb were eligible. Of these, 1378 were assigned to the intervention group and 1542 to the control group. Internal validation of predictions of the observed outcomes showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79, while external validation yielded an AUROC of 0.71. Covariate balance of the TARNet model latent representation, as measured by the Wasserstein distance, was 3.6 × 10⁻⁷ for the internal data set and 4.2 × 10⁻⁷ for the external data set. Based on the estimated reduction of predicted mortality, a distinction was made between treatment responders ( Conclusions: Corticosteroid treatment responders were those with severe metabolic acidosis and impaired circulation, whereas patients who were less ill based on these parameters were more likely to have increased mortality rates by corticosteroid treatment. There was also a notable discrepancy between the model's suggestions and the physicians' treatment that was carried out, implying improvements in the clinical assessment of patients with sepsis are necessary. Given recent years have not yielded new treatments for sepsis, computational clinical decision-support systems are worth exploring.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCausalityDecision support systemsGlucocorticoidsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41736785
PMCPMC12925864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.