ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2026
The reliability of the plethysmographic perfusion index for detecting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perfusion index and fluid responsiveness: Are we asking the right question?Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Variation of perfusion index to evaluate fluid responsiveness during the preload challenge tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The assessment of fluid responsiveness (FR) is critical during the initial management of acute circulatory failure (ACF). However, in resource-limited settings or emergency situations, advanced hemodynamic monitoring is often unavailable. The plethysmographic perfusion index (PPI), a non-invasive parameter derived from pulse oximetry, has been proposed as a surrogate marker for changes in cardiac output. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the PPI to detect FR in critically ill patients with ACF during early resuscitation. Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted over seven months (February to September 2024) in a 10-bed intensive care unit. Adult patients with ACF requiring a 500-mL fluid bolus were enrolled. FR was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, defined as Results: Fifty patients (29 males and 21 females) were included, with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 57-77). Sepsis-related ACF accounted for 60% of cases. FR was observed in 33 patients (66%). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for ΔPPI was 0.778 (95% CI: 0.638 to 0.883, Conclusion: The PPI demonstrated moderate accuracy in detecting FR during early resuscitation of ACF. As a simple, non-invasive, and widely accessible tool, PPI holds promise for informing fluid management decisions in emergency and critical care settings. Further technological refinements may enhance its diagnostic performance and broaden its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.