ArticleERJ open research2026
Hospitalisations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: insights from the IPF-PRO Registry and EMPIRE Registry.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence-based diagnosis models for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Hospitalisations and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: lessons from two continents.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Clinical impact of hospitalization in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We used data from the European MultiPartner IPF Registry (EMPIRE) and the US Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-PRospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) Registry to examine the frequency of hospitalisation, risk factors associated with hospitalisation, and whether hospitalisation affected 5-year mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods: Data from January 2015 to September 2022 in EMPIRE and from June 2014 to December 2023 in the IPF-PRO Registry were analysed. Rates of hospitalisation and death were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between patient characteristics at enrolment and time to hospitalisation were assessed using Cox regression. Results: The EMPIRE and IPF-PRO Registry cohorts comprised 2989 and 1001 patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 36.5 months in EMPIRE and 60 months in the IPF-PRO Registry. Overall, 20.3% of patients in EMPIRE and 70.3% (28.2% over 36 months) in the IPF-PRO Registry had one or more hospitalisation during follow-up. In both registries, lower percentage predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and use of supplemental oxygen at enrolment were associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation in multivariable models. 5-year mortality did not differ between patients who were and were not hospitalised in EMPIRE (54.3% and 53.7%, respectively) or in the IPF-PRO Registry (51.7% and 46.1%, respectively). Conclusions: Data from EMPIRE and the IPF-PRO Registry demonstrate the high risk of hospitalisations and mortality among patients with IPF and suggest there may be differences across countries in risk of hospitalisation. Variability in data collection, healthcare systems and clinical practices should be considered when interpreting differences between countries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.