ArticleERJ open research2026
High
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum: "High2026
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary emphysema on computed tomography (CT) is a risk factor for all-cause mortality in individuals with and without airflow limitation. The aim of this study was to assess whether Methods: This single-centre retrospective observational study included participants who repeatedly underwent intensive cancer screening with unenhanced chest CT and semiquantitative Results: We evaluated 2112 participants (1502 male; mean±sd age 59±10 years; 395 currently smoking, 820 previously smoked; 1958 no emphysema, 152 mild emphysema, two moderate emphysema on visual CT inspection). The median follow-up duration was 1470 (interquartile range 1330-1705) days. Higher cSUV Conclusion: Semiquantitative FDG uptake was independently associated with longitudinal emphysema progression in both of the participants who currently and previously smoked. Semiquantitative PET/CT may provide useful information for early intervention in participants at high risk for emphysema progression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.