ArticleERJ open research2026
Clinical relevance of CompEx Asthma and impact on disease trajectory: benralizumab effect.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mirror, mirror on the wall: is CompEx the fairest endpoint of all?ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe exacerbations (SevEx), the typical endpoint when evaluating asthma therapies, may provide incomplete assessment, as it relies on patient perception of disease and physician action. CompEx, a composite outcome that includes SevEx and acute worsening events (AWEs) (evaluated from e-diary entries using deterioration in peak expiratory flow (PEF), reliever medication use and worsening asthma symptoms), should provide more objective assessment. The correlation of CompEx event subtypes - SevEx only, AWE only or mixed SevEx/AWE - with disease trajectory and effect of benralizumab in the SIROCCO and CALIMA trials were evaluated. Methods: This was a Results: 953 patients were included (benralizumab, n=465; placebo, n=488). Greater increases in asthma symptoms and reliever medication use, declines in PEF and slower return to baseline were seen around AWE and mixed SevEx/AWE than SevEx, according to treatment utilisation. Overall, patients without a CompEx event had the best FEV Conclusions: CompEx includes SevEx and AWEs, both of which are clinically relevant events, providing a more comprehensive assessment of asthma worsening than SevEx alone. AWEs are particularly important contributors to poor asthma outcomes and should not be ignored when evaluating treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.