ArticleThe Journal of pathology2026
Pathological classification of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy into several types and their relationships with CTG18.1 expansion repeats.
Article in The Journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tissue-level heterogeneity in FECD: Descemet's membrane phenotypes and association with TCF4 CTG18.1 expansionThe Journal of pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Late-onset Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the most common primary disease of the corneal endothelium and the leading indication for corneal transplantation in Western countries. It is characterized by progressive accumulation, over two to three decades, of extracellular matrix (ECM) components in Descemet's membrane (DM), leading to the formation of abnormal excrescences, known as guttae, and additional DM layers. Clinical forms and evolutionary profiles vary widely among patients. FECD is strongly associated with intronic CTG trinucleotide repeats (TNRs) in the transcription factor 4 (TCF4) gene. We analysed 500 DMs removed during keratoplasty for FECD across 25 European centres to identify different anatomopathological forms of the disease. Following flat mounting and dehydration, the samples were digitized using transmitted light microscopy and independently assessed by three independent readers. A total of ten parameters - six related to guttae and four on other forms of ECM - were scored. Principal component analysis and an unsupervised clustering method separated three clusters from these parameters. In addition, manual classification was performed by grouping samples with major common features. The number of TNRs in TCF4 was analysed by short tandem repeat (STR)- and triplet repeat primed-polymerase chain reaction (TP-PCR) for 109 patients. We found that (1) five FECD phenotypes exist; (2) guttae and other ECM structures were radially arranged in 95% of samples; (3) 33% of samples exhibited peripheral radial striae that corresponded to a hypertrophied form of similar structures present in healthy corneas; and (4) patients with fewer than 50 TNRs had only two out of five phenotypes and had a significantly higher number of peripheral radial striae (94% versus 49%, p < 0.001). Taken together, these new findings demonstrate the existence of different FECD phenotypes; reveal that lesions affect both the centre and the periphery of the endothelium; and suggest that radial deposits may be produced by pathological cells migrating from the periphery towards the centre. © 2026 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.