Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736702›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2026

Pathological classification of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy into several types and their relationships with CTG18.1 expansion repeats.

Hanielle Vaitinadapoulé, Daria Onitiu, Corantin Maurin, Gauthier Travers, Emmanuel Crouzet, Oliver Dorado-Cortez, Sylvain Poinard, Zhiguo He, Fabien Forest, Edouard Ollier and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hanielle VaitinadapouléLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Daria OnitiuLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Corantin MaurinLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Gauthier TraversLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Emmanuel CrouzetLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Oliver Dorado-CortezLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Sylvain PoinardLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Zhiguo HeLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Fabien ForestLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Edouard OllierClinical Research Unit, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France.
Renaud TouraineLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Philippe GainLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Jean-Marc PeroneOphthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Regional, Metz-Thionville, France.
Gilles ThuretLaboratory 'Biology, Engineering and Imaging for Ophthalmology', BiiO, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3486-2875
French Fuchs Study Group (FFSG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Late-onset Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the most common primary disease of the corneal endothelium and the leading indication for corneal transplantation in Western countries. It is characterized by progressive accumulation, over two to three decades, of extracellular matrix (ECM) components in Descemet's membrane (DM), leading to the formation of abnormal excrescences, known as guttae, and additional DM layers. Clinical forms and evolutionary profiles vary widely among patients. FECD is strongly associated with intronic CTG trinucleotide repeats (TNRs) in the transcription factor 4 (TCF4) gene. We analysed 500 DMs removed during keratoplasty for FECD across 25 European centres to identify different anatomopathological forms of the disease. Following flat mounting and dehydration, the samples were digitized using transmitted light microscopy and independently assessed by three independent readers. A total of ten parameters - six related to guttae and four on other forms of ECM - were scored. Principal component analysis and an unsupervised clustering method separated three clusters from these parameters. In addition, manual classification was performed by grouping samples with major common features. The number of TNRs in TCF4 was analysed by short tandem repeat (STR)- and triplet repeat primed-polymerase chain reaction (TP-PCR) for 109 patients. We found that (1) five FECD phenotypes exist; (2) guttae and other ECM structures were radially arranged in 95% of samples; (3) 33% of samples exhibited peripheral radial striae that corresponded to a hypertrophied form of similar structures present in healthy corneas; and (4) patients with fewer than 50 TNRs had only two out of five phenotypes and had a significantly higher number of peripheral radial striae (94% versus 49%, p < 0.001). Taken together, these new findings demonstrate the existence of different FECD phenotypes; reveal that lesions affect both the centre and the periphery of the endothelium; and suggest that radial deposits may be produced by pathological cells migrating from the periphery towards the centre. © 2026 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionAgedDescemet MembraneEndothelium, CornealExtracellular MatrixFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePhenotypeTranscription Factor 4Transcription FactorsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsTCF4 protein, humanTranscription Factor 4Transcription Factorsclassificationcorneal endotheliumCTG18.1 trinucleotide repeat expansionDescemet's membraneextracellular matrixFuchs endothelial corneal dystrophyphenotypes

Identifiers

PMID41736702
PMCPMC13140138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.