Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41736508›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2026

Unexpected Evolutionary Divergence of Tachykinin-Positive Neurons Innervating the Central Complex in Hexapods.

Uwe Homberg, Jing Xu, Tim Keyser, Fedor Suzdalenkov, Fabian Wimmer, Martina Fromandi, Stefano Bianco, Michelle Tez, Stefan Dippel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Uwe HombergDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8229-7236
Jing XuDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Tim KeyserDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Fedor SuzdalenkovDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5833-1020
Fabian WimmerDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Martina FromandiDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Stefano BiancoDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Michelle TezDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Stefan DippelDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HO 950/24-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HO 950/26-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central complex comprises an assemblage of midline-spanning neuropils in the brain of insects that play a key role in goal-directed orientation and navigation vector calculation. The central complex consists of layers of tangential input neurons that contact topographically organized columnar neurons which provide outputs to the right and left brain hemispheres. Its anatomical organization and functional role are regarded as highly conserved across insects. In addition to classical neurotransmitters, a wide range of neuropeptides have been detected in the central complex including peptides of the tachykinin family. Because the cellular identity of tachykinin-containing neurons in the central complex has not been determined in most cases, we used antisera against tachykinin I and II from the migratory locust, termed Lom-TKs, to identify the immunolabeled neurons in hexapods ranging from flightless two-pronged bristletails to flies. The data show that LomTK-related peptides are present in the central complex of all studied species except crickets. In most species one or several types of columnar neurons were immunolabeled, sometimes together with certain subsystems of tangential input neurons. The types of immunolabeled columnar neurons, however, are distinctly different between species from different orders, in some cases even between insects within the same order, and comprise cell types that innervate either the upper or lower division of the central body. This high degree of evolutionary divergence of tachykinin-positive neurons, even in closely related groups, may be related to species-specific differences in navigational requirements and calls for caution with respect to homologizing neurons across clades.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainInsectaNeuronsTachykininsAnimalsSpecies SpecificityTachykininscentral bodyhexapod phylogenyimmunocytochemistryinsect brainneuropeptideprotocerebral bridge

Identifiers

PMID41736508
PMCPMC12933162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.