ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Prophylactic carbetocin versus oxytocin following vaginal delivery among women with high risk for postpartum hemorrhage: A before-and-after study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionData with a high level of evidence is lacking on the use of prophylactic uterotonic drug following vaginal delivery to prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) among women who were considered high-risk for PPH. Our main objective was to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic carbetocin versus oxytocin in preventing PPH after vaginal delivery among women at high risk. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective before-and-after single-center comparative study, including all high-risk women after vaginal births. Two consecutive 14-month periods were compared, where the prophylactic methods to prevent PPH differed: oxytocin (5 IU IV) versus carbetocin (100 μg IV) given immediately after vaginal delivery. High-risk women were defined by at least one of the following criteria: previous PPH (blood loss ≥500 mL), antenatal suspicion of macrosomia (estimated fetal weight >90th p), twin pregnancy, repeated cervical ripening methods, polyhydramnios, multiparity (≥4), and rapid labor (<2 h) without analgesia. The primary outcome was PPH. Secondary outcomes included severe PPH (blood loss ≥1000 mL), second-line uterotonic agents, surgical hemostatic procedures, uterine artery embolization, and maternal morbidity. Groups were matched 1:1 by risk criteria. Outcomes were assessed using univariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression, and propensity score adjustment.
resultsA total of 754 women (377 per group) were included. Maternal and labor characteristics were comparable. Rates of PPH and severe PPH were similar with carbetocin versus oxytocin (7.4% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.36; 2.9% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.83). The need for second-line uterotonics (additional oxytocin and/or sulprostone) was significantly lower with carbetocin (3.7% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). Other secondary outcomes did not differ. After adjustment for potential confounders (history of PPH, BMI, intrapartum fever), prophylactic carbetocin was not associated with increased risk of PPH (aOR = 1.85, 95% CI [0.97 to 3.57]). Propensity score analysis confirmed these findings (aOR = 1.33, 95% CI [0.74 to 1.72]).
conclusionsProphylactic carbetocin was associated with a similar rate of PPH in high-risk women after vaginal delivery, compared with oxytocin, but significantly reduced the use of oxytocin when carbetocin was used as the first-line agent, although there was no difference in the use of prostaglandins or invasive procedures to manage persistent PPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.