Trial reportJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2026
Effect of point application therapy for bronchial asthma: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective role of summer acupoint application therapy on weather-triggered rheumatoid arthritis flares.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Assessment of pediatric nurses' knowledge of budesonide-formoterol inhaler technique: a cross-sectional study in tertiary hospitals in China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the efficacy of point application therapy (PAT) in alleviating the exacerbation of chronic respiratory diseases represented by bronchial asthma.
methodsIn this multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial, eligible bronchial asthma patients received placebo PAT on the dog days of the first summer to establish a baseline, and then patients who continued to participate in the trial and repassed the eligibility review were randomized to receive regular or placebo PAT in the next two consecutive summers. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the number of asthma exacerbations at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included severity of asthma exacerbation, asthma control test (ACT) score, percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
resultsA total of 835 patients with bronchial asthma were randomized in this trial. Compared with the placebo control, the PAT significantly decreased the mean number of asthma exacerbations (1.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 2.14;
conclusionPAT conducted on dog days could reduce asthma exacerbations in patients with bronchial asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.