ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Aging and longevity in decades-old genebanked seeds from U.S. endangered plant species: Assessments using survival and RNA integrity assays.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From molecular decline to regeneration failure: seed aging in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) challenges the conservation of forest reproductive material.Tree physiology · 2026Review
- Aging and longevity in decades-old genebanked seeds from U.S. endangered plant species: Assessments using survival and RNA integrity assays.American journal of botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseSeed longevity is critical for successful genebanking, but it is hard to detect or predict. We examined survival of genebanked seeds from species native to the United States to estimate longevity. We tested whether RNA integrity (RIN) can be used to detect aging and predict mortality.
methodsDry seeds from >100 species were stored for 28 ± 7 yr at -18°C. A recently harvested sample (cohort) from the same population provides a zero-time reference. Germination and RIN were assessed and differences between cohorts were used to distinguish short-lived seeds from long-lived seeds.
resultsNo differences in germination or RIN were detected between cohorts in about one-fourth of the species. Viability and/or RIN was lower in the stored cohort than in the recently harvested cohort in most species, and the size of the difference was used to infer aging rates. Differences in germination and RIN were correlated among the 100 samples tested; moderate correlation coefficients indicate that additional factors are involved in seed aging and its detection.
conclusionsOverall, longevity in the genebank appears to be similar for seeds from wild and domesticated species. We identified species that appeared to produce quite long-lived and short-lived seeds. Seeds from wild species tend to germinate slowly and asynchronously, and this confounds comparisons across storage times; deterioration is detected mostly after severe mortality. By contrast, RIN values decline before viability loss is detected and appear to be unaffected by wild seed traits. RIN tests during early storage can help predict seed longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.