ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2026
Effects of sequencing platforms on the profiling of root mycorrhizal communities in Pinus densiflora.
Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a powerful and efficient tool for surveying mycorrhizal mycobiome diversity, surpassing classical methods in accuracy and throughput. Long-read NGS techniques are increasingly applied under the assumption that they provide better taxonomic resolution, yet their use often lacks a balanced evaluation against the established strengths and limitations of widely used short-read NGS technologies. This study compares Illumina MiSeq and PacBio Sequel platforms in analyzing the mycorrhizal mycobiome of Pinus densiflora roots, focusing on how sequencing platforms and database choice influence taxonomic resolution and diversity patterns. Both platforms detected mycorrhizal taxa with similar taxonomic resolution, recovering nearly all taxa previously reported from pine roots. Most mycorrhizal taxa were shared between datasets, although several taxa were detected exclusively by one platform. In terms of diversity, the short-read dataset showed higher diversity due to greater sequencing depth, whereas the long-read dataset offered improved identification of rare or closely related taxa owing to longer sequence information. Moreover, supplementing reference databases with locally derived sequences enhanced taxonomic resolution and the detection of native taxa in both approaches, with a stronger effect for the long-read dataset. Overall, our results emphasize that short- and long-read sequencing each have distinct advantages for mycorrhizal community analysis, and that the use of curated local reference databases is essential to maximize taxonomic resolution and improve the detection of regionally unique taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.