ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
A computational model for retinal haemodynamics under gravitational and postural variations.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome presents a significant risk during long-duration spaceflight, yet the retinal mechanisms underlying these visual changes remain poorly characterized. We developed a physiologically detailed lumped-parameter model coupling a five-compartment retinal vascular network with a dynamic intraocular pressure module responsive to hydrostatic shifts. Head-down tilt experiments were reproduced to emulate cephalad fluid shifts in microgravity. Model outputs are closely aligned with experimental benchmarks. Intraocular pressure increased from 16.3 mmHg (upright) to 29.5 mmHg at -30° (81% increase), while ocular perfusion pressure remained within 2 mmHg, reflecting haemodynamic responses. Retinal blood-flow predictions fell within the interquartile range of in vivo Doppler measurements, and peak systolic velocity trends in the central retinal artery agreed within 1% of ultrasound data after incorporating a microgravity-induced 4% central retinal artery constriction. These findings validate the model's ability to capture the coupled influence of systemic arterial pressure, venous drainage and intraocular pressure on retinal perfusion across gravitational states. Simulations revealed that posture-induced elevations in arterial pressure and intraocular pressure propagate non-linearly through the retinal tree, imposing the greatest mechanical stress on the central retinal artery and arteriolar segments, critical sites for flow dysregulation and potential optic nerve damage. By integrating retinal and ocular biomechanics, the model developed in this work offers mechanistic insight into the pathogenesis of neuro-ocular syndrome, establishes quantitative thresholds to inform countermeasure development, and provides a transferable tool for terrestrial disorders involving intraocular pressure and vascular dysregulation, such as glaucoma and hypertensive retinopathy. KEY POINTS: Microgravity and postural changes alter ocular circulation, contributing to spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS), yet their impact on retinal haemodynamicsremains poorly characterized. We present a lumped-parameter model that dynamically couples intraocular pressure (IOP) with retinal blood flow through a five-compartment vascular network. The model simulates posture-induced hydrostatic changes and accurately reproduces trends in IOP, ocular perfusion pressure and retinal flow observed in head-down tilt experiments. Simulations reveal that arterial compartments (especially the central retinal artery) are the most sensitive to gravitational stress and vascular constriction, identifying key sites of haemodynamic vulnerability. This framework provides novel mechanistic insights into the retinal contributions to SANS and offers a validated platform for evaluating countermeasures and studying ocular pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.