ArticleAmerican journal of men's health
Engaging and Recruiting Black Men With Stroke or TIA in a Randomized Clinical Trial Conducted: Addressing Research Barriers and Developing Solutions for Successful Engagement.
Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This report describes implementation of a clinical trial testing a behavioral approach to reduce stroke risk factors in Black men with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A survey of research team members identified macro-, mediator-, and micro-level barriers and facilitators to research engagement and participation and identified approaches to address these barriers. Not being aware of the study was the key macro-level barrier. The team used multiple methods of outreach to inform participant candidates including in-person and virtual community events. Key mediator-level barriers were lack of phone and transportation access, and clinicians not referring patients. A multi-pronged strategy was employed, including in-person meetings (for those who lived in the region) often at locations that were accessible to men in their neighborhoods. To help with transportation challenges the team provided ride-share services, bus fare or parking vouchers. At the micro-level, the team also used multiple approaches to help participants manage barriers related to stress or family life circumstances and acute or chronic health conditions. Being able to conduct assessments remotely was critical to being able to reach this community of men who often had significant functional impairments, such as difficulty walking or in speech fluency because of the effects of stroke. When possible, staff encouraged the involvement of care partners. Successful research outreach and engagement addresses barriers at the macro-, mediator-, and micro-levels, and use mixed-method (in-person + virtual) approaches targeted to the specific challenges individuals may be facing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.